Nordic Naturals is facing a legal challenge after a New York court rejected the company’s attempt to dismiss a class action lawsuit. The suit, filed by the Sultzer Law Group on behalf of plaintiff Natalie Orrico, claims that the company’s use of the word “natural” in its name is misleading, as some of its supplements contain synthetic ingredients.
The case was brought before the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of New York, and the recent ruling means the lawsuit will proceed. The central argument is that consumers may reasonably assume that all ingredients in Nordic Naturals products are natural, simply because of the company’s name.
What’s in the Products?
The lawsuit highlights a range of ingredients in Nordic Naturals products that the plaintiffs argue are synthetic. These include citric acid, gelatin, glycerin, and certain vitamins, such as beta-carotene, niacin, riboflavin, and thiamine. The complaint refers to federal regulations that define synthetic substances as those that are chemically manufactured or altered, even if derived from natural sources.
While Nordic Naturals initially became well-known for its omega-3 fish oil products, the company now offers a wide variety of supplements. The lawsuit specifically lists 73 different products from the brand, accusing them of containing synthetic ingredients, which it argues contradict the natural image associated with the company name.
Legal Implications for Nordic Naturals
The legal battle is far from over, and the case could become costly for Nordic Naturals, especially due to the large number of products involved. The brand’s entire range of supplements, all labeled with the term “Naturals,” could be at risk. Some legal experts have pointed out that the next stage in the case will likely focus on class certification, where the judge will determine whether the lawsuit can proceed as a class action.
Matthew Orr, an attorney with Amin Talati Wasserman, has commented on the case, suggesting that it may be too aggressive to argue that a company’s name automatically implies that all its products are made entirely from natural ingredients. He notes that legal cases often rely on the “reasonable consumer” standard, which questions whether an average consumer would assume, based solely on a company’s name, that all its products meet certain criteria.
The “Reasonable Consumer” Standard
Despite this argument, Sultzer Law Group has found success in similar cases, particularly in the New York court, which has seen several of these class action suits progress. As the case moves forward, Nordic Naturals may attempt to prove that a reasonable consumer would not assume that the company’s name guarantees that all ingredients in its products are natural. Consumer surveys and other forms of evidence might be used to show that the average shopper doesn’t necessarily link the word “natural” in the brand name to every ingredient in every product.
The legal experts suggest that, going forward, Nordic Naturals may focus on demonstrating that most consumers understand that a company name does not necessarily imply that every ingredient is natural. The lawsuit continues to raise questions about how companies use terms like “natural” and whether they can be held accountable for the perceptions they create through their branding.
A Changing Landscape for “Natural” Labels
The CEO of Nordic Naturals, Joar Opheim, chose the company’s name nearly 30 years ago, long before these kinds of lawsuits became commonplace. Today, however, legal experts caution against using terms like “natural,” “safe,” or “clean” in product branding, as these terms are often targeted by plaintiffs’ attorneys in class action cases.
As the case continues, it will serve as an important reminder for companies in the natural products industry to carefully consider how they market their products and the potential legal implications of the words they use in branding. The outcome of this case could influence future labeling practices across the industry.
Leave a Comment